Which Teaching Method Is More Effective in a Communication Course – Role-Playing Versus Simulated Patients, Taught by Tutors or Faculty Staff? A Randomized Trial

Which Teaching Method Is More Effective in a Communication Course – Role-Playing Versus Simulated Patients, Taught by Tutors or Faculty Staff? A Randomized Trial
Lead Author: Julia Herchenröther
Submitted by: Amy Lorion, National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners

The article details the results of a study created “as part of the medical history-taking course … that aimed to establish if lecturers or tutors led to better results in student performance. The study also aimed to investigate if the use of simulated patients or role-playing with fellow students led to better communication skills in the students.” The authors find that “in history-taking courses students who trained an increased number of times with SP benefited more from instruction by a university lecturer and that groups led by peer tutors benefited more from the use of RP,” with “RP” referring to the role-playing with fellow students.

Read the full article here.

Communications and Connections Committee Mission: “To bring high-quality reporting of current research, trends, techniques, and information regarding SP methodology and other relevant industry articles to the attention of the membership through the web-based ASPE eNews blog.”

Please provide comments, questions, or suggestions about the ASPE eNews Blog here.

Share this post:

Comments on "Which Teaching Method Is More Effective in a Communication Course – Role-Playing Versus Simulated Patients, Taught by Tutors or Faculty Staff? A Randomized Trial"

Comments 0-5 of 0

Please login to comment